Dynamic Governance of Multi-LLM Agent Systems for Collaborative Conversational Outcomes

Dynamic Governance of Multi-LLM Agent Systems for Collaborative Conversational Outcomes

When two LLM agents with structurally opposed objectives interact across multiple turns, the absence of a shared goal function produces not competition but collapse: the visitor capitulates, the site agent stops varying its approach, and the conversation terminates without achieving either agent's stated objective. This paper asks whether a control-theoretic governance layer can substitute for that missing goal function. The Experience Orchestrator (EO) addresses this in a simulated financial services environment where a site agent guides a visitor toward advisor contact while the visitor maintains psychologically realistic resistance. EO governs the joint trajectory through three mechanisms: a Contextual Bandit (CB) that selects content arms calibrated from real-world web analytics, a PID controller that enforces behavioral consistency via dynamic schema constraints, and a POMDP belief tracker that maintains a probabilistic model of visitor intent. Across 60,000 simulations, EO achieves a +32 percentage point lift in high-intent advisor contact rate (78.1% vs.

46.1% over a naive LLM control), with CB variant selection accounting for 97% of between-factor outcome variance -- confirming that the governance policy, not environmental initial conditions, determines where trajectories end up. Persona-level analysis reveals two distinct regimes: for visitors with no natural inclination toward conversion, the governance layer is the difference between a functional system and a non-functional one; for visitors already near alignment, a naive LLM's empathetic defaults are largely sufficient. All findings are conditional on LLM-to-LLM simulation. The PID controller has not been calibrated against real human unpredictability, and validating EO on live traffic is the critical next step. ar Xiv Labs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new ar Xiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with ar Xiv Labs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. ar Xiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for ar Xiv's community? Learn more about ar Xiv Labs .

Sources cited: 📰 ArXiv AI ↗

⚡ Effects Interpreter

🌍World Economy

  • The ripples can spread across borders, nudging growth forecasts here and there.
  • Confidence among international firms might wobble until the picture clears.

🏙️Local Economy

  • Jobs and trade close to home could feel a soft knock-on effect.
  • The high street usually mirrors big-picture shifts, just a little later.

🏦Rates & Banks

  • Banks tend to wait and see before nudging the rates they offer.
  • Savers might glance at their account rate — lenders adjust after big events.

❤️Health

  • The strain, if any, tends to show up quietly in everyday life.
  • Day-to-day stress can creep up if this starts touching familiar routines.

💷Wealth

  • Investors often reshuffle their holdings when stories like this break.
  • Your pension or investments might sway a touch as markets digest this.

🏠Housing

  • Any effect on bricks and mortar is likely to be slow and modest.
  • House prices and rents are unlikely to shift the moment this news breaks.
Share: 𝕏 Twitter Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp

Editorial note: This analysis was produced by the News Effects Interpreter, an AI editorial tool that cross-references 1 independent news sources and contextualises events in terms of their real-world impact on ordinary people. Original reporting is linked above. News Effects does not alter the facts of source reports.